The Roman Empire
Fuasta

Obverse:

Enlarge

Reverse:

Enlarge

Coin Details

Origin/Country: ANCIENT - ROMAN EMPIRE (1st CENT BC - 5th CENT AD) ROMAN EMPIRE Fausta, AD 324-326
Design Description: Nobilissima Fausta Numus
Item Description: AE3 (BI Nummus) Thessalonica. Wreath+star as Nobilissima Femina
Full Grade: NGC AU Strike: 5/5 Surface: 2/5
Owner: Kohaku

Set Details

Custom Sets: The Roman Empire
Competitive Sets: This coin is not competing in any sets.
Research: NGC Coin Price Guide

Owner Comments:

Placeholder text: The coinage of Fausta as Augusta commenced with her elevation to full imperial status in AD 324. Preceding these issues, however, was a remarkable series struck circa AD 318 at the Thessalonica mint on which both Fausta and her mother-in-law, Helena, are accorded the lesser title of Nobilissima Femina (N F). Both ladies had borne this rank for a considerable time: Helena since Constantine's elevation to imperial status in AD 306, Fausta since her marriage to Constantine in March of the following year. The significance of this anepigraphic reverse remains uncertain, though it presumably contains some reference to divine providence and destiny.Detailed Owner's comments are pending.

Coin Details: ROMAN EMPIRE, Fausta As nobilissima femina, AD 307-324, Æ Follis (19mm, 2.94 g, 1h), Thessalonica mint, Struck under Constantine I, AD 318-319, N3/5, GC Grade: AU, Strike: 5/5, Surface: 2/5, Obverse: Draped bust right, FAVS-TA N F, Reverse: Eight-pointed star within laurel wreath, d TSA, References: RIC VII 49 var. (mintmark as •TS•A•); LRBC 825. VF

The coinage of Fausta as Augusta commenced with her elevation to full imperial status in AD 324. Preceding these issues, however, was a remarkable series struck circa AD 318 at the Thessalonica mint on which both Fausta and her mother-in-law, Helena, are accorded the lesser title of Nobilissima Femina (N F). Both ladies had borne this rank for a considerable time: Helena since Constantine's elevation to imperial status in AD 306, Fausta since her marriage to Constantine in March of the following year. The significance of this anepigraphic reverse remains uncertain, though it presumably contains some reference to divine providence and destiny.

To follow or send a message to this user,
please log in